Novel Schemes of Exegesis
Sometimes a novel scheme of exegesis is simply wicked eisegesis driven by a cowardly credulity; a rejection of the God-breathed … Continue reading Novel Schemes of Exegesis
Sometimes a novel scheme of exegesis is simply wicked eisegesis driven by a cowardly credulity; a rejection of the God-breathed … Continue reading Novel Schemes of Exegesis
Here is a piece of slanderous Lewisian spittle-fleck on the Psalms: “The ferocious parts of the Psalms serve as a … Continue reading C.S. Lewis: Spittle-Fleck on the Psalms
“But then, indeed, not knowing God, you served as slaves [to] the ones by nature not being gods” (Galatians 4:8; … Continue reading Which by nature are no gods
John Davenant writes in his A Dissertation on the Death of Christ (underlining mine): “Lastly, our own Divines, who do … Continue reading A Special Intention
In a section (lecture) called “Arminian Theory of Redemption,” R.L. Dabney writes concerning the Arminian doctrine (i.e., damnable figment) of … Continue reading Exceptions
In his System of Alexander Campbell: An Examination of its Leading Points, R.L. Dabney writes: “… when we observe that … Continue reading Vitiators of Vitals
Not a blanket-endorsement of R.L. Dabney as a true Christian, but I like these statements he makes about those who … Continue reading Impure Portraiture
R.L. Dabney makes some observations on Habakkuk 2:15 (not a promotion or endorsement of Dabney as a true Christian, but … Continue reading Sin Of Tempting
R.L. Dabney writes: “If the reader expects from so scholarly a source something new and better than the staple arguments … Continue reading Triumph Of Mercy
Heretic R.L. Dabney making exceptions to the Mark 16:16 and Romans 1:16 rule: “There were once two Jewish babies, John and … Continue reading Dabney’s Impious Presumptions