WCF full-subscriptionist position
Pietros wrote: I looked at the title of this thread and saw “Wicked Westminster Confession” and thought maybe this Forum … Continue reading WCF full-subscriptionist position
Pietros wrote: I looked at the title of this thread and saw “Wicked Westminster Confession” and thought maybe this Forum … Continue reading WCF full-subscriptionist position
grace987 wrote: Another gospel INCLUDES WORKS (like Nahum’s) with his FULL ASSURANCE=FAITH position. That is definitely WORKS>>>>!!!! You have to … Continue reading Full assurance
grace987 wrote: Yes, I am judging you and all like you as unregenerate who insist on that position you and … Continue reading Of navel-gazers and straw-men
Wilderness Voice wrote: Be nice to those who authored the WCF, after all they did include the following clause in … Continue reading Perniciously peculiar
Book Man responding to my “Wicked Westminster Confession” article: Dude, You and your little cadre of writers are so far … Continue reading Roger Nicole a hyper-calvinist?
Ask Mr. Religion wrote: The OP [original poster–CD] smacks of arrogance where epistemic humility is certainly warranted. Nahum [me–CD] might … Continue reading A display of epistemic arrogance
The following comes from the Fighting Fundamentalist Forums. This is how Chris Huff reacted to my article’s title (“The Wicked … Continue reading Bow to the Almighty
From the “Wicked Westminster Confession” thread at The Fighting Fundamentalist Forums. This particular post was around April, 2010: Originally Posted … Continue reading Counting noses and respecting faces
More of my interaction with members of The Fighting Fundamentalist Forums that took place sometime in January of 2010: Originally … Continue reading Respecters of men
I posted my article The Wicked Westminster Confession to The Fighting Fundamental Forums some time ago. The following is what … Continue reading Westminster Assembly in historical context